
Across the latest 5 completed matches, the team recorded 0 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses, scoring 1.20 and allowing 2.20 goals per match. Both teams scored in 80%, clean sheets were kept in 0% and matches reached three or more goals in 80%.
Try a club, country, competition or fixture name.
Start typing a club name above.
The key fixture details in one place, followed by form, H2H trends and the available match data.
Voting closes once a match kicks off. Here is how fans predicted this one.
Each result is marked W, D or L from the selected team’s perspective.

Across the latest 5 completed matches, the team recorded 0 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses, scoring 1.20 and allowing 2.20 goals per match. Both teams scored in 80%, clean sheets were kept in 0% and matches reached three or more goals in 80%.

Across the latest 5 completed matches, the team recorded 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, scoring 1.00 and allowing 2.80 goals per match. Both teams scored in 40%, clean sheets were kept in 40% and matches reached three or more goals in 60%.
Nagoya GrampusWin ratios, scoring trends and first-half patterns from the available H2H sample.
In the latest 10 head-to-head meetings, Nagoya Grampus won 3, Kyoto Sanga won 3 and 4 finished level. The matchup averaged 2.80 total goals, both teams scored in 80%, Over 2.5 goals occurred in 40% and at least one first-half goal was recorded in 60%.
Home events appear on the left and away events on the right.
Pitch view is shown by default. Switch to list view for a compact squad sheet.


1
Daniel Schmidt
70
Teruki Hara
13
Haruya Fujii
55
Shuhei Tokumoto
9
Yuya Asano
15
Sho Inagaki
31
Tomoki Takamine
27
Katsuhiro Nakayama
7
Ryuji Izumi
22
Yudai Kimura
11
Yuya Yamagishi











1
Gakuji Ota
22
Hidehiro Sugai
50
Yoshinori Suzuki
34
Henrique Trevisan
44
Kyo Sato
8
Takuji Yonemoto
25
Sung-jun Yoon
39
Taiki Hirato
7
Masaya Okugawa
88
Barreto
18
Temma Matsuda











Daniel SchmidtG
Teruki HaraD
Haruya FujiiD
Shuhei TokumotoD
Yuya AsanoM
Sho InagakiM
Tomoki TakamineM
Katsuhiro NakayamaM
Ryuji IzumiF
Yudai KimuraF
Yuya YamagishiF
Yuki NogamiD
Hidemasa KodaM
Takuya UchidaM
Alexandre PisanoG
Kennedy Egbus MikuniD
Taichi KikuchiM
Masahito OnoM
Shungo SugiuraF
Kensuke NagaiF

Gakuji OtaG
Hidehiro SugaiD
Yoshinori SuzukiD
Henrique TrevisanD
Kyo SatoD
Takuji YonemotoM
Sung-jun YoonM
Taiki HiratoM
Masaya OkugawaF
BarretoF
Temma MatsudaF
João PedroM
Fuchi HondaM
Rafael EliasF
Ryuma NakanoM
Taiyo HiraokaM
Masaaki MurakamiG
Shogo AsadaD
Yusuke IshidaD
Haruki AraiMEvents are aligned by team, with HT, FT, AET and penalty-stage bars shown where applicable.
Nagoya GrampusTimeKyoto Sanga
Statistics are grouped into attacking, possession, passing, defending and discipline widgets.
Nagoya Grampus18 metricsKyoto Sanga
A complete statistical summary calculated from the available recent meetings.
In the latest 10 head-to-head meetings, Nagoya Grampus won 3, Kyoto Sanga won 3 and 4 finished level. The matchup averaged 2.80 total goals, both teams scored in 80%, Over 2.5 goals occurred in 40% and at least one first-half goal was recorded in 60%.
Kyoto Sanga1 – 1HT 0 – 1Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus1 – 2HT 0 – 0Kyoto Sanga
Kyoto Sanga1 – 1HT 0 – 0Nagoya Grampus
Kyoto Sanga3 – 2HT 0 – 2Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus1 – 1HT 0 – 1Kyoto Sanga
Kyoto Sanga2 – 1HT 1 – 0Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus1 – 0HT 0 – 0Kyoto Sanga
Kyoto Sanga1 – 1HT 0 – 1Nagoya Grampus
Kyoto Sanga0 – 1HT 0 – 0Nagoya Grampus
Nagoya Grampus6 – 1HT 1 – 0Kyoto Sanga
The fixture is scheduled for May 10, 2026 at 10:00. The listed venue is Toyota Stadium.
In the latest 10 head-to-head meetings, Nagoya Grampus won 3, Kyoto Sanga won 3 and 4 finished level. The matchup averaged 2.80 total goals, both teams scored in 80%, Over 2.5 goals occurred in 40% and at least one first-half goal was recorded in 60%.
FalconScores classifies the match outlook as low, medium or high by considering available prediction percentages, comparative team indicators, recent form strength and the size of the head-to-head sample. It is an informational analysis and not a guaranteed outcome.
Yes. The Lineups tab includes both teams, formations, head coaches, starting players and substitutes. Pitch view is the default and list view is available with one tap.
The recent rating combines results, points won, scoring output, defensive performance, goal difference and clean-sheet trends from the latest completed matches.
BTTS is the percentage of analysed matches in which both teams scored. Over or Under percentages show how often the total match goals finished above or below a specified goal line, such as 2.5 goals.
Events are arranged chronologically with home-team actions on the left and away-team actions on the right. Period bars show half time, full time, extra time and penalties where those stages apply.
Yes. FalconScores displays all 18 supplied statistics and groups them into attacking, possession and passing, defending and discipline, and other match data.
The poll is a free fan-engagement feature that shows the percentage of supporters selecting the home team, draw or away team. It does not involve money or prizes.